High-Volume Injection Molding & DFM Case Study

 

Electrical Product Development from Concept to 100,000+ Unit Production

 

Client: Lesco Manufacturing

Designing an injection molded product is very different from designing a product that can be manufactured reliably in high volume.

Over roughly two decades of product-development work for Lesco Manufacturing, Ben Nel developed approximately 65 electrical products and related assemblies, supporting projects from early product development through tooling, first-off-tool evaluation and commercial production.

The work combined:

  • injection molded plastic product design

  • injection molding DFM

  • progressive-die metal component DFM

  • mechanical mechanism design

  • Design for Assembly

  • electrical product packaging

  • tooling interaction

  • first-off-tool corrections

  • assembly and testing equipment

  • production support

Selected products developed through this relationship were manufactured in quantities exceeding:

100,000 Units

This case study focuses on two examples:

  • 4-Way 232 Electrical Adaptor – 2006

  • Cover Strip Range – 2015

4way-232-injection-molding-dfm-case-study
4way-232-injection-molding-dfm-case-study


Project at a Glance

Client: Lesco Manufacturing

Product category: Electrical products, adaptors, switches and related assemblies

Relationship: Long-term product development spanning roughly two decades

Products developed: Approximately 65

Selected examples: 4-Way 232 Adaptor and Cover Strip Range

Manufacturing processes: Injection molding, progressive-die metal stamping and product assembly

3DDFM / Ben Nel role: Product development, aesthetic design, plastic part design, DFM, mechanisms, Design for Assembly, first-off-tool changes and production support

Tooling: Injection mold and progressive-die tooling designed and manufactured by specialist Chinese tooling suppliers

Plastic production: South Africa

Assembly and testing: South Africa

Production volume: Selected products exceeded 100,000 units


The Manufacturing Challenge

Electrical adaptors and switches may appear relatively simple externally, but internally they can contain a large number of tightly packaged components.

These components may include:

  • injection molded housings

  • electrical contacts

  • stamped metal parts

  • switches

  • sliding components

  • rocker mechanisms

  • springs

  • terminals

  • fasteners

  • internal insulating features

All of these components must fit together correctly while meeting the requirements of the intended electrical product, manufacturing process and production assembly system.

At high production volumes, a design problem that appears minor during development can become a significant production issue.

A component that is difficult to orient, assemble or manufacture does not create a problem once.

It creates the same problem thousands of times.

This made Design for Manufacturing and Design for Assembly important throughout the development process.


Product Development from Concept Through Production

The work did not stop when the CAD model was completed.

Ben’s involvement covered the product-development process from concept through production, including:

Product and Aesthetic Design

The external appearance and product architecture had to satisfy functional, manufacturing and commercial requirements.

The product geometry also had to accommodate the electrical and mechanical components required inside each assembly.

Injection Molded Plastic Part Design

Plastic components were developed around injection molding requirements including:

  • practical wall sections

  • draft

  • ribs

  • bosses

  • part separation

  • assembly interfaces

  • snap and retaining features

  • internal component location

  • tooling access

  • manufacturable geometry

Progressive-Die Component DFM

Many of the electrical products also contained stamped metal components.

These components had to work correctly with the molded plastic parts while remaining practical for progressive-die production and repeatable high-volume assembly.

Mechanism Development

Some products included sliding and rocking mechanisms used in electrical switches and related assemblies.

The design challenge was not simply creating movement.

The mechanisms needed to:

  • operate consistently

  • fit inside a compact product

  • interact correctly with electrical components

  • be manufacturable

  • be assembled reliably

  • remain practical for high-volume production


Designing Products That Cannot Easily Be Assembled Incorrectly

One particularly important requirement was error-proof assembly.

The production environment included a diverse assembly workforce, including employees with disabilities.

Where practical, components were therefore designed so that they could only be installed in the correct orientation.

This approach is commonly described as:

  • Design for Assembly

  • mistake-proofing

  • error-proof assembly

  • assembly-orientation control

Rather than depending entirely on an assembler noticing whether a small component was facing the correct direction, the physical geometry of the product helped prevent incorrect assembly.

Examples of this design philosophy included:

  • asymmetric locating features

  • controlled component orientation

  • keyed interfaces

  • geometry that prevented incorrect insertion

  • clear assembly sequence

  • component location features

This reduced assembly ambiguity and supported more consistent production.

For high-volume products, Design for Assembly is not merely a convenience.

It can directly affect:

  • production consistency

  • assembly time

  • rework

  • testing

  • product reliability


Example 1: 4-Way 232 Electrical Adaptor

Developed in 2006

The 4-Way 232 Electrical Adaptor is one example from the broader Lesco product-development relationship.

The product combined injection molded plastic components with stamped electrical components and required careful packaging of the internal parts within a compact housing.

Ben’s work included:

  • product architecture

  • aesthetic design

  • plastic component design

  • injection molding DFM

  • DFM for stamped metal components

  • internal component packaging

  • assembly design

  • mechanical feature development

  • tooling interaction

  • first-off-tool review

  • production changes where required

The production tooling itself was designed by specialist Chinese tooling manufacturers.

Ben’s responsibility was the product and component engineering, ensuring that the parts provided to the tooling suppliers were developed around the intended manufacturing and assembly processes.

4-Way 232 electrical adaptor developed for high-volume injection molded production

 


Why First-Off-Tool Review Matters

A production-ready CAD model does not mean the engineering work necessarily ends when the mold is manufactured.

Once the first production parts are molded, the real components can reveal issues that were difficult to predict completely in CAD.

These may involve:

  • fit

  • assembly

  • shrinkage

  • component alignment

  • snap engagement

  • interference

  • tolerances

  • cosmetic surfaces

  • mechanism movement

Ben remained involved during first-off-tool evaluation and corrective product changes.

This experience is important because successful injection molded product development requires understanding not only how a component should look in CAD, but also how the molded part behaves when it comes out of a real production tool.


Example 2: Lesco Cover Strip Range

Developed in 2015

The Cover Strip Range is another example of a product family developed for injection molded production.

The underlying product direction came from the client.

Ben’s role was to translate that direction into detailed, production-ready product geometry.

The work included:

  • product development

  • aesthetic refinement

  • injection molded part design

  • injection molding DFM

  • internal packaging

  • assembly development

  • product detailing

  • tooling interaction

  • first-off-tool changes

  • production support

The Cover Strip concept was client-led and is not presented as an invention by 3DDFM or Ben Nel.

3DDFM’s contribution was the engineering and product development required to turn the concept into manufacturable products.

[IMAGE: Cover Strip Range CAD/render]


Designing Around Electrical Product Requirements

Electrical products introduce constraints that go beyond appearance and injection molding alone.

The Lesco work required product geometry to be developed around relevant South African electrical product and safety requirements.

This affected areas such as:

  • component separation

  • electrical contacts

  • insulating geometry

  • terminal access

  • mechanical protection

  • assembly

  • product architecture

The responsibility of the product designer is therefore not simply to create an attractive plastic housing.

The mechanical design, electrical components, assembly process and manufacturing method must function together as a complete product system.


Tooling and International Manufacturing Coordination

For these Lesco products, the injection molds and progressive-die tooling were designed and manufactured by specialist suppliers in China.

Ben did not design the Lesco production tooling.

Instead, his role included developing the product geometry for manufacturing and remaining involved as the designs moved through tooling and first production parts.

This distinction is important.

Effective DFM requires collaboration between:

Product Designer → Toolmaker → Manufacturer → Assembly Operation

Toolmaker feedback may result in modifications to:

  • part geometry

  • split lines

  • draft

  • undercuts

  • steel conditions

  • ejector access

  • stamped-part geometry

  • assembly features

The objective is to maintain the product’s function and appearance while making the parts practical to manufacture reliably.


Production Assembly and Testing

Product development also extended into the production environment.

Ben designed:

  • assembly jigs

  • production fixtures

  • testing jigs

for products developed during the Lesco relationship.

This created a direct connection between product design and the way the product would eventually be:

manufactured → assembled → tested → released

That production exposure strongly influenced the Design for Manufacturing approach used in later projects.

A product should not only be easy to mold.

It should also be practical to:

  • assemble

  • inspect

  • test

  • package

  • maintain in repeatable production


What Does This Case Study Demonstrate?

Have you designed injection molded products that reached high-volume production?

Yes.

Selected products developed during the Lesco relationship were manufactured in quantities exceeding 100,000 units.

The work covered product development from concept through injection molding DFM, tooling interaction, first-off-tool corrections and production support.


Can you take a plastic product from concept toward injection mold tooling?

Yes.

The Lesco work included product architecture, injection molded component design, manufacturing preparation, toolmaker interaction and evaluation of first production parts.

For new plastic products preparing for tooling, see our:

Injection Molding Design Service


Do you have experience with Design for Assembly?

Yes.

Assembly was a significant engineering consideration across the Lesco product range.

Many components were intentionally designed with orientation and locating features that reduced the possibility of incorrect assembly.

This was particularly important for products containing multiple small electrical and mechanical components.


Do you design injection molds?

3DDFM has injection mold design experience, but the tooling for the Lesco products shown in this case study was not designed by Ben Nel.

Specialist Chinese toolmakers designed and manufactured those molds.

Ben designed the products and remained involved through tooling feedback, first-off-tool evaluation and production changes.

A separate 3DDFM case study demonstrates a commercial electronic enclosure where Ben designed the complete injection mold tooling.

Electronic Enclosure & Mold Design Case Study


What happens after the injection mold is built?

First-off-tool or T1 parts should be reviewed against the engineering requirements before production is approved.

Typical checks include:

  • dimensions

  • fit

  • assembly

  • warpage

  • sink

  • surface quality

  • snap features

  • mechanism operation

  • component alignment

Changes discovered at this stage may require product modifications, tooling corrections or both.

The objective of strong DFM is to identify as many risks as possible before tooling, while still allowing the design team to respond intelligently to what is learned from real molded parts.


When should DFM be performed?

Ideally, Design for Manufacturing should begin before production tooling is ordered.

The later major manufacturing problems are identified, the more expensive they normally become to correct.

If a product already exists in CAD and you need an independent manufacturing review before committing to tooling, see:

Design for Manufacturing Consulting


From Injection Molding Guidelines to Real Production

Successful injection molded product development requires more than following a checklist.

Wall thickness, draft, ribs, bosses, undercuts, assembly features and tooling strategy interact with one another as part of the complete product.

For technical guidance on these subjects, see:

Injection Molding Design Guidelines

This case study demonstrates how those manufacturing principles form part of real product development at commercial production volumes.


Need an Injection Molded Product Prepared for Production?

3DDFM supports companies developing plastic products that need to move from concept or prototype toward tooling and production.

Our work can include:

  • product development

  • injection molding DFM

  • production-ready CAD

  • Design for Assembly

  • mechanical mechanisms

  • electronic component packaging

  • toolmaker interaction

  • first-off-tool evaluation

  • production design changes

Injection Molding Design Service

Design for Manufacturing Consulting


More Production-Proven Engineering Case Studies

See additional real manufacturing examples covering electronic enclosures, injection mold tooling and sheet metal product engineering.

View Manufacturing Case Studies

Chat with DFM Engineer
Talk to a DFM Engineer